Alpha, describing the fist-fight that took place in the church library today: I think Brad* was on his period or something.
* The instigator, and not his real name.
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Wednesday, May 26, 2010
Something adorifying, and something angeramusing
What? Is randomly putting words together out now?
Ugh, fine. Adorable/horrifying. I give you smoking baby:
EMBED-Ardi Rizal - The real SMOKING BABY !! - Watch more free videos
And angering/amusing:
Any reference to a father "helping out" by adequately performing the whole fathering part of his fatherly duties.
Though, considering that Smoking Baby started smoking when his dad started giving him cigarettes, I guess we should all stand an applaud when a man who fathered a child can be bothered to change its diaper, feed it, or glance at it occasionally while watching TV.*
* Yes, I sometimes refer to babies as its. But I've never taught one to smoke.
Ugh, fine. Adorable/horrifying. I give you smoking baby:
EMBED-Ardi Rizal - The real SMOKING BABY !! - Watch more free videos
And angering/amusing:
Any reference to a father "helping out" by adequately performing the whole fathering part of his fatherly duties.
Though, considering that Smoking Baby started smoking when his dad started giving him cigarettes, I guess we should all stand an applaud when a man who fathered a child can be bothered to change its diaper, feed it, or glance at it occasionally while watching TV.*
* Yes, I sometimes refer to babies as its. But I've never taught one to smoke.
Ummmmm...
So when do I have to start studying for that bar thing?
Saturday, May 22, 2010
Hello From Destination
So I love this vacation.
More than I ever thought I could.
But I will say this.
People who think we need less government regulation are kidding themselves. Or, at the very least, are so lacking in life experience that they have never found themselves in the middle of a marketplace where people handle raw meat with their hands, where dog food is repacked into ziploc bags, where whole pig heads are on display, where people kill cats within feet of the produce section, and where you can suddenly run into a TIGER CAGE. WITH TIGERS IN IT.
Sweet, sweet FDA. How I have missed you.
More than I ever thought I could.
But I will say this.
People who think we need less government regulation are kidding themselves. Or, at the very least, are so lacking in life experience that they have never found themselves in the middle of a marketplace where people handle raw meat with their hands, where dog food is repacked into ziploc bags, where whole pig heads are on display, where people kill cats within feet of the produce section, and where you can suddenly run into a TIGER CAGE. WITH TIGERS IN IT.
Sweet, sweet FDA. How I have missed you.
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Countdown to Destination Wedding
This may be dorky, but the thing I am looking forward to most in Destination is not the ocean, the pool, the days spent doing no doc review ... but the oatmeal. Such oatmeal! 'Tis the stuff food dreams are made of.
I went to Destination for spring break once, and my friend recommended I order the oatmeal for breakfast ... OFF THE MENU. It was delicious. Best oatmeal EVER.
I may even break out my camera and take a picture of it so you all can be jealous. (That is why people take pictures of their food, right?)
Mmmmmmmm ... oatmeal jealousy ...
I went to Destination for spring break once, and my friend recommended I order the oatmeal for breakfast ... OFF THE MENU. It was delicious. Best oatmeal EVER.
I may even break out my camera and take a picture of it so you all can be jealous. (That is why people take pictures of their food, right?)
Mmmmmmmm ... oatmeal jealousy ...
Monday, May 17, 2010
It's not just the sex. It's also the food preparation.*
Sometimes I think that the worst part of being single is not having an automatic personal assistant.
Whenever I need to make a doctor's appointment, talk to an insurance company, pay my phone bill, I think to myself, Ugh, if only I could outsource this.
I'm not saying you should treat your spouse like a servant, but there is definitely something to that whole economies of scale thing. Sure, I want love and companionship, but I also want someone who will unload the dishwasher.
Anyway, my friend Diego visited for the weekend. I had to go in to work at one point, and when I got back, he had assembled my new hammock, tidied up my living room and was hemming a pair of my work pants.
I know who I'm fake marrying if it ever comes to that.
* Guess the quote for an imaginary bonus point. :)
Anyway, my friend Diego visited for the weekend. I had to go in to work at one point, and when I got back, he had assembled my new hammock, tidied up my living room and was hemming a pair of my work pants.
I know who I'm fake marrying if it ever comes to that.
* Guess the quote for an imaginary bonus point. :)
Sunday, May 16, 2010
You suck, Jack Weyland
My friend Sandy and I have a theory that a thousand Mormon girl hearts have broken over the lessons that one Mr. Jack Weyland taught us as impressionable youth. Now, my good e-friend MCB has already written an extensive post about the failings of Charly, Stephanie, et al, so I won't rehash too much.
As Mormon kids, we were taught a lot of things that turned out to be ... well, "false" probably isn't the right word, but "not-quite-true"? I'm not talking about anything particularly doctrinal, I'm talking about general platitudes that teachers and youth advisors told you. For example, "People who offer you drugs are not your friends." Answer at age fifteen? "True." Answer at age twenty-six? Well, having never run into that proverbial drug dealer who wanted to get me hooked after a free taste, I must say that I have never have offered drugs by a non-friend, and am confident most of the offers I have received were suggested in good faith. So ... "Not really."
The big lesson that Sandy and I learned from Jack Weyland -- and I'm sure other girls learned as well -- was, "When you date a non-member or less active boy, he will convert/reactivate if you (a) are a good, shining, wholesome example of righteousness, and (b) you give that sneaky Holy Ghost one chance to reach his wounded heart." It usually helps if, despite his non-member/inactive status, he still basically lives all the standards a young Mormon man ought to. (I have never understood this phenomenon in Mormon youth literature. If I were not Mormon, my innate social awkwardness and sense of the romantic would keep me from being slutty, but I'm fairly sure I would be drinking copious amounts of alcohol on a regular basis.)
Anyway, getting back on track -- having grown up and gone out into the world, girls like me and Sandy have realized that this "lesson" led us to have unrealistic expectations of the boys we date. In fact, the real lesson has turned out to be, "Never, ever, ever listen to anything you learned from Jack Weyland."
I think I have learned this far more important lesson. And in general, since I date inactive boys and nonmembers in far greater frequency (topic for another post) than Mormon boys, I have had plenty of opportunities to keep my expectations of a St. Augustine/Alma the Younger moment at a rock-bottom low.
Which leads me to the tale of MysteryBoy.
MysteryBoy is some combination of inactive Mormon/generic-non-member/practicing Catholic/reform Jew/technical Muslim/cultural Buddhist/atheist/videogamer/vegan. I dated him/am dating him/will date him at some point in time. You may have even dated your own MysteryBoy.
MysteryBoy is a stud. He's smart and funny and considerate and charming and all those positive adjectives you want to be able to apply to the people you date. And the chances of MysteryBoy finding his way into the Mo-Mo fold are basically nil. Therefore, I actively did not/do not/will not expect any such change on MysteryBoy's part, and therefore will remain undisappointed when he does not. (If by some chance, however, a combination of my shining wholesomeness -- don't laugh, people who know me -- and the Holy Ghost on the top of his game DO wind up landing MysteryBoy's bottom in a wardhouse pew, I will offer Mr. Weyland my sincerest apologies.)
The funny thing is, the Weylandism pops back up when you least expect it.
On one of our dates (jeez, this past/present/future tense is hard ...), MysteryBoy and I watched a movie called Letting Go Of God. It's a one-woman play by Julia Sweeney that documents her spiritual journey through Catholicism, Eastern religions, and finally atheism, all triggered (oddly enough) by a visit from two LDS missionaries. It's actually a lot funnier and more cheerful than it sounds. I generally find atheists to be grim and (in the words of Jon Stewart and The Daily Show) "people who replace faith in God with the worship of their own smug sense of superiority." But Julia Sweeney cracked me up with her sincere, hilarious and heart-breaking tale of spiritual growth and death.
At the end of the movie, MysteryBoy looked over at me with a -- dare I say it? -- hopeful look in his eye. "Well, how did you like the movie?"
"It was really funny," I said honestly. "And she said a lot of thought-provoking things. That song at the end has gotta go, though." (So true. Just because it's a one-woman play doesn't mean you can't spring for a real songwriter, Jules.)
"Thought-provoking, huh? Did it, uh, provoke any particular thoughts?"
I couldn't help it -- I started to smile. "MysteryBoy, quick question. Did you think a two hour movie was going to make me leave Mormonism?"
"No," he said emphatically, in a tone of voice that said 90%-no-10%-yes.
"Awwwww, MysteryBoy," I said fondly. "You just got Jack Weylanded."
As Mormon kids, we were taught a lot of things that turned out to be ... well, "false" probably isn't the right word, but "not-quite-true"? I'm not talking about anything particularly doctrinal, I'm talking about general platitudes that teachers and youth advisors told you. For example, "People who offer you drugs are not your friends." Answer at age fifteen? "True." Answer at age twenty-six? Well, having never run into that proverbial drug dealer who wanted to get me hooked after a free taste, I must say that I have never have offered drugs by a non-friend, and am confident most of the offers I have received were suggested in good faith. So ... "Not really."
The big lesson that Sandy and I learned from Jack Weyland -- and I'm sure other girls learned as well -- was, "When you date a non-member or less active boy, he will convert/reactivate if you (a) are a good, shining, wholesome example of righteousness, and (b) you give that sneaky Holy Ghost one chance to reach his wounded heart." It usually helps if, despite his non-member/inactive status, he still basically lives all the standards a young Mormon man ought to. (I have never understood this phenomenon in Mormon youth literature. If I were not Mormon, my innate social awkwardness and sense of the romantic would keep me from being slutty, but I'm fairly sure I would be drinking copious amounts of alcohol on a regular basis.)
Anyway, getting back on track -- having grown up and gone out into the world, girls like me and Sandy have realized that this "lesson" led us to have unrealistic expectations of the boys we date. In fact, the real lesson has turned out to be, "Never, ever, ever listen to anything you learned from Jack Weyland."
I think I have learned this far more important lesson. And in general, since I date inactive boys and nonmembers in far greater frequency (topic for another post) than Mormon boys, I have had plenty of opportunities to keep my expectations of a St. Augustine/Alma the Younger moment at a rock-bottom low.
Which leads me to the tale of MysteryBoy.
MysteryBoy is some combination of inactive Mormon/generic-non-member/practicing Catholic/reform Jew/technical Muslim/cultural Buddhist/atheist/videogamer/vegan. I dated him/am dating him/will date him at some point in time. You may have even dated your own MysteryBoy.
MysteryBoy is a stud. He's smart and funny and considerate and charming and all those positive adjectives you want to be able to apply to the people you date. And the chances of MysteryBoy finding his way into the Mo-Mo fold are basically nil. Therefore, I actively did not/do not/will not expect any such change on MysteryBoy's part, and therefore will remain undisappointed when he does not. (If by some chance, however, a combination of my shining wholesomeness -- don't laugh, people who know me -- and the Holy Ghost on the top of his game DO wind up landing MysteryBoy's bottom in a wardhouse pew, I will offer Mr. Weyland my sincerest apologies.)
The funny thing is, the Weylandism pops back up when you least expect it.
On one of our dates (jeez, this past/present/future tense is hard ...), MysteryBoy and I watched a movie called Letting Go Of God. It's a one-woman play by Julia Sweeney that documents her spiritual journey through Catholicism, Eastern religions, and finally atheism, all triggered (oddly enough) by a visit from two LDS missionaries. It's actually a lot funnier and more cheerful than it sounds. I generally find atheists to be grim and (in the words of Jon Stewart and The Daily Show) "people who replace faith in God with the worship of their own smug sense of superiority." But Julia Sweeney cracked me up with her sincere, hilarious and heart-breaking tale of spiritual growth and death.
At the end of the movie, MysteryBoy looked over at me with a -- dare I say it? -- hopeful look in his eye. "Well, how did you like the movie?"
"It was really funny," I said honestly. "And she said a lot of thought-provoking things. That song at the end has gotta go, though." (So true. Just because it's a one-woman play doesn't mean you can't spring for a real songwriter, Jules.)
"Thought-provoking, huh? Did it, uh, provoke any particular thoughts?"
I couldn't help it -- I started to smile. "MysteryBoy, quick question. Did you think a two hour movie was going to make me leave Mormonism?"
"No," he said emphatically, in a tone of voice that said 90%-no-10%-yes.
"Awwwww, MysteryBoy," I said fondly. "You just got Jack Weylanded."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)